This piece addresses the idea of discipline in architectural discourse today.

Download
  • “If the discipline were important, we wouldn’t have anxiety about it.”

  • “… architecture is constantly trying to define the discipline within its particular moment and time.”

  • “…a religious psychophantism that’s a possible orthodoxy way of performing discipline.”

  • “… when you are teaching something, […] you have to have a framework from which you are teaching from, it has to be in some ways projective.”

  • “…the plan and the section are so important…”

  • “[…] a big problem at the moment is a lot of architecture students and a lot of architects working in the profession aren’t able to see how […] to leverage things from our body of knowledge and transform them.”

Credit

Producer

Griffin Ofiesh

Issue Editors

Joseph Bedford and Curt Gambetta

Senior Editors

Joseph Bedford and Curt Gambetta

Collaborators

Hans Tursack, Yshai Yudekovitz and Paul Ruppert.

Announcer

Trudy Watt

Interviewers

Joseph Bedford, Curt Gambetta, Mark Acciari, Joanna Grant, and Kevin Pazik.

Interviewees

Andrew Atwood, Laurel Broughton, Tomas Klassnik, Andrew Kovacs, Jimenez Lai, Michael Loverich, Anna Neimark, James Tate and Elly Ward.